REVIEW

Damn you Harry Potter, because the effort four years ago to exploit the potential box-office by dividing the last film into two parts now slowly going even has become a new trend that is worth trying. Not treatment is a sin indeed, but the problem is not all movie adaptation deserve such treatment, not all books or novels have qualified material to be broken down into several sections, there is certainly a positive thing, but not a few negative things that can arise . The first part of the final film in the trilogy fight Panem country is suffering because of that last, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1, a bit forced, feeble, faint, and facile formality fission for farewell.

The struggle to free the hands of the dictator named Panem of Coriolanus Snow (Donald Sutherland) resumed, where after a surprise when it managed to "steal" Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) when reaching the Quarter Quell middle end, the figure behind the scenes of the struggle continues to try to continue the mission that they have designed it. Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman) with a woman named Alma Coin (Julianne Moore) have designed a revolution to gradually take over Panem, and their first effort is to try to take advantage of a fire that has burned uprising remotely, from District 13.

Yes, Katniss Mockingjay has been attached to the image, because the attitude of "bold" that he show while in the arena of battle The Hunger Games has managed to attract the attention of the majority population of the country of Panem that the freedom they desire is not something that is impossible. This young woman becomes the center of the revolution, he seems to be a puppet in which the excess try in exploration to further enlarge the flames of revolt, one by creating a propaganda video. But unfortunately the other hand, President Snow also seeks to quell the rebellion, and he had a very effective weapon, a weapon capable of making Katniss becomes unsteady: Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson).

Not just a few but very sure a lot of people who have read the novel trilogy The Hunger Games Mockingjay is said that the book belongs to the weakest of Suzanne Collins's trilogy, but the opposite is actually happening to me, super slightly better than cathing Fire, and imo is the best book of this trilogy. Perhaps the theme of the first shift of the majority of the fight action contains "real" in the field and then slightly move toward "mind war" or battle strategy much influence on the judgment that the book Mockingjay is weak, it does not move as dynamic as two books initially, he was more contains games of intrigue in tranquility but had an intense friction, even emotions in this book is the most "human" status behind the two main characters are limited to be puppet of the two conflicting parties.

But as mentioned earlier was that no matter how exciting, intense, intimate, thrilling story generated a novel, not all of them deserve to be broken down to be two parts, and a cunning and stubborn attitude of Lionsgate finally getting hit hard in the film Here you are. Although it contains a manipulative game by using the media to push a political element moving ever forward, Mockingjay basically do not have enough material to be split into two equal parts is not only large but also just as good, where the drama and action to help each other.

So do not be surprised if you are going to feel like there is something missing in this film from what ever you feel in the two previous films, as The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 deliberately play in the drama, and was saving action for part two. Is it something wrong? No, but its impact Francis Lawrence has failed to provide an adventure that not only balanced in both the drama and action, but an adventure that also continue to be able to burn the attractiveness or the spirit of the audience in a struggle that was built character. Less dynamic, all the pleasures and interesting things they have built from the beginning as not getting a great opportunity to grow very well.

Not that bad, even from the side of the conflict itself we will be easy to find out what really happened between the Capitol, District 13, and the rest of Panem, and their main efforts to make the audience more curious about the second film is also fairly good, but the problem is rather than as a bridge that connects us from one round to the second half of this movie is more pronounced as an extra time that is too soft. Yes, too soft, and the story becomes the main issue. The impact is felt when at the beginning we had the novelist as a screenwriter, then in the second film we get two Oscar class writer, and this time the story was written by a figure behind the success of political themed tv-movie, Game Change.

Finally, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 as fully stuck in that last theme, the game is full of political intrigue, watching the characters wrestle with their plans in an underground bunker while occasionally given the situation that occurred in the districts out there. So the problem is what? The problem is in addition to their decision to be faithful to the novel, Danny Strong and Peter Craig did not successfully develop a synopsis above was to strengthen the charm of a struggle, but it makes the planning of the uprising that weaken the heroic Katniss has been piling up for this, and it is unfortunate given the fact that a great battle had been waiting for them.

Many small parts that can be cut from the film, to then make room for the second half true can also be combined into a single packaging films. Francis Lawrence may be argued he wanted to further develop character, and change the color to the darker story, but the progress that he gave in two of these things seem small, which will also make you start to think otherwise, it's all about business.